Forum

CapSealing.com » Forums » Webinars, Achieving a Perfect Seal Everytime
Operating Window
You are not logged in.
Posting as Guest.
Replies: 11 - Pages: [1] 2 - Last reply: 2009-06-01 - By: Post reply
Author Message

Mark Plantier
(Admin)

Posts: 7
Registered:
2009-03-13

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01, 09:56:40)
How likely would a seal problem be, when you insert the seals by hand?

It is important the foil liner has uniform, downward pressure around the entire land area of the container. Proper installation and positioning of the foil is key, ensuring no particles, residue, etc. contaminate the surfaces. Inserting material by hand may also cause excessive wrinkling of the foil which can create sealing problems.

Back to top
http://enerconind.com

Mark Plantier
(Admin)

Posts: 7
Registered:
2009-03-13

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01, 09:58:00)
How would you seal to a surface without torque?

Packagers have two options for sealing containers without application torque on the liner. The first is a pressure-belt system which utilizes an induction sealing head integrated with a belt to provide downward pressure on caps without torque, or pressure directly onto liners. For containers without caps Enercon offers a variety of contact induction sealing configurations ranging from manual systems, to indexing and rotary for high speed applications.

Back to top
http://enerconind.com

rschuelke
(Member)

Posts: 4
Registered:
2009-05-20

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01)
Under what circumstances is a secondary application torque necessary?

Retorque depends on the removal torque requirements of the packager. Most packagers will retorque child resistant closures to ensure the child resistant feature is not compromised. It is important to place the retorquer as far down line from the sealer as possible to give the innerseal adequate time to set.

Back to top
http://enerconind.com/sealing

rschuelke
(Member)

Posts: 4
Registered:
2009-05-20

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01)
Does a dispensing closure with an induction liner typically require a higher torque? Are there recommended seal diameters for a given closure inner diameter?

A dispensing closure does not typically require any additional torque than a similar size non-dispensing closure, but it will normally require a different sealing head than a CT or CRC of the same size. Inner diameter is best supplied by container & closure manufacturer. We see them range from the same diameter as the closure to a couple mm smaller.

Back to top
http://enerconind.com/sealing


(Member)

Posts: 7
Registered:
1970-01-01

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01)
What is the Optimal air gap? 70mm and 53mm cap

The optimal air gap is dependent on the manufacturer’s specification for a given sealing head coil. A typical air gap is between 1/8” (3 mm) and 3/8” (10mm) based on your manufacturer’s specifications. Variations in your bottle height may also impact your settings.

Back to top


(Member)

Posts: 7
Registered:
1970-01-01

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01)
What advice or guidelines can you give for intermittent FPM or CPM, can this drastically affect ouput of sealing heads? The more foils under the head, the bigger the power draw – and the less foils under the head = surplus?

For lines that will have speed variations beyond your operating window Enercon offers an option called Variable Sealing Control which automatically adjusts output power based on changes in line speed to ensure consistent sealing. Enercon induction sealers regulate a fixed output current value (at a given output percentage). This design ensures the eddy currents induced in each foil are consistent whether one container or several containers are under the sealing head at a given time (intermittent CPM). If the conveyor speed (FPM) varies, the amount of time the foil liner is under the sealing head is also varying. You need to ensure that the speed variation is within the operating window that you have set-up. Otherwise you may have varying sealing success without the Variable Sealing Control Option.

Back to top


(Member)

Posts: 7
Registered:
1970-01-01

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01)
What advice or guidelines can you give for intermittent FPM or CPM, can this drastically affect ouput of sealing heads? The more foils under the head, the bigger the power draw – and the less foils under the head = surplus?

For lines that will have speed variations beyond your operating window Enercon offers an option called Variable Sealing Control which automatically adjusts output power based on changes in line speed to ensure consistent sealing. Enercon induction sealers regulate a fixed output current value (at a given output percentage). This design ensures the eddy currents induced in each foil are consistent whether one container or several containers are under the sealing head at a given time (intermittent CPM). If the conveyor speed (FPM) varies, the amount of time the foil liner is under the sealing head is also varying. You need to ensure that the speed variation is within the operating window that you have set-up. Otherwise you may have varying sealing success without the Variable Sealing Control Option.

Back to top


(Member)

Posts: 7
Registered:
1970-01-01

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01)
Have you used 6 sigma tools to help a customer determine a optimal sealer setting?

This is an excellent idea, and in fact something Enercon is evaluating. As of today, specific quality standards are determined by the customer. Though the induction sealer is an integral part of the sealing process, there are many other variables outside of the direct control of the induction sealer.

Back to top


(Member)

Posts: 7
Registered:
1970-01-01

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01)
In setting up min and max energy levels, do you go by a statistical level of good seals (at min level), and statistical level of overheated ones at the max? Or, just when you see ONE good and ONE overheated?

We encourage customers to incorporate specific quality standards, including statistical sampling to check for errors. A statistical method would be ideal to determine the best setting, but you would need at least 30 samples at each level to begin to be statistically significant. Recognizing that the Enercon induction sealer regulates a fixed output current, ensuring consistent power delivered to each foil liner at a given output percentage, checking one bottle at a time is often used as long as all other variables are verified and consistent.

Back to top


(Member)

Posts: 7
Registered:
1970-01-01

QUOTE ( @ 2009-06-01)
With a ”flat head” sealer, do you recommend the head be angled for closures that range from 28mm to 38mm?

Enercon’s all in one flat sealing head shouldn’t need to be angled for the diameter closures mentioned. This can be verified by checking the quality of the sides of the seal near either extreme of the sealing window.

Back to top
[1] 2

Post a reply

Keep it polite and on topic.
You can use BBCode

Post reply
Name:You are posting as guest. Log in
Subject:
Message:
Please enter the code on the left.